Wednesday, July 20, 2005

EU Heart China?

What an inauspicious couple. Beaurocratic, arrogant, and increasingly undemocratic Europe on one hand; empirialist, militarist, and anti-human rights China on the other. Both major world players by themselves, together this ugly couple could do very scary things. Ugh. And evidently, some would like to see Mongolia and Kazakhstan be the point of geo-physical union. Sick. But it's just the kind of thing the folks in Brussels dream about.
The president of the European Union Commission, Jose Barroso, has just completed a visit to China, which this year celebrates the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations with Brussels.

Fifteen to 20 years from now the EU, enlarged further eastwards, more integrated and more independent, might prove to be the model for the governance of macro-regions, paving the way for a global political architecture that can cope with technological, economic and business globalization.

China 2020, a booming platform, will be the link between Eastern Eurasian sub-regions, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Central Asia and Northeast Asia. With this anticipation in mind, we now have to shape the relationship between these two matrices of civilization.

In the post-Cold-War world, the relationship between Europe and China has gained momentum. However, as the world dramatically changed for a second time in a decade in the fall of 2001, Beijing, a model for developing countries (paving the way to poverty reduction), and Brussels, a model for cooperation between countries (paving the way to articulate sovereignty and globalization), have to take greater responsibilities to work as the main architects of a cooperative Eurasia.

In the post-September 11 world disorder, the EU and China have to conceive a genuine strategy to act as Eurasia's structuring poles, making them into the pillars, with the US, of a stable world order.

...The attitude of Central Eurasia's rising power, Kazakhstan, and of a democratic Mongolia - whose intellectual and political elite understands better than others Eurasian dimensions - complete also the picture of a Eurasian arc where a momentum for closer cooperation is gathering.
Read more about this disastrous plan for the new world order at the Asia Times (via Joel J. Legendre's Asian Gazette).

3 Comments:

Anonymous guile said...

nice, cozy place you got here :)..

7/20/2005 6:20 PM  
Anonymous yan said...

Gosset is just some scholar who apparently likes China a lot and is interested in closer Chinese-European ties. He is in no way speaking on the EU's behalf.

I don't think the idea is all that bad, actually. Gosset only failed to think about two things: whether China is really ready to respect that what belongs to them belongs to them and what belongs to their neighbours belongs to their neighbours (all that disputes about tiny islands in the East and South China Seas should really make one somewhat secptical). The other questions is how realistic an EU-like model can be for NEA at all. I for myself wouldn't want a country like Russia to join the EU, simply because they're too big and have never really broken with the past when the Russian empire just occupied several current EU-members.

7/22/2005 5:12 AM  
Blogger samraat said...

sangambayard-c-m.com

4/04/2010 10:04 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home